News
Creatives That Overcome Pain Points: Affiliate Case Studies By N1 Partners
What mistakes do partners most often make when launching and scaling ad campaigns?
What real challenges do they face in day-to-day work, and what prevents them from achieving stable results?
In this case study series by N1 Partners, we break down real affiliate campaigns, highlight common pain points in affiliate marketing, and show how partners find practical solutions that lead to measurable success.
This edition focuses on ad creatives. No abstract “best practices” – only concrete mechanics, insights, and ideas you can apply to your campaigns right away.
The cases were shared by Bogdan Solodushchenko, Affiliate Team Lead, and Dmitrii Filippov, Affiliate Team Lead (SEO).
CASE 1 (Facebook Traffic)
Context
- GEO: DE
- Traffic source: Facebook
- Brand / vertical: N1Bet
- Campaign goal: Increase conversion
Initial Challenge (Pain Point)
- What wasn’t working in the creatives?
The creatives showed a low conversion rate from registration to first deposit.
- Was the issue related to format, messaging, visuals, or the offer?
Primarily to the information shown in the creatives and the creative format itself.
What the Data Revealed
- Which metrics indicated the problem?
Low reg-to-dep conversion.
- Where did the funnel break?
At the creative level and during audience targeting.
What Was Tested
- Visuals
Aggressive, dynamic video creatives with slot gameplay.
- Messaging (emotional vs rational)
High aggression and heavy use of triggers.
- Focus: bonus / product / UX
Emphasis on the bonus and a female character in video creatives.
Decision Made
What was changed in the creatives?
- Updated the bonus and featured a top-performing slot with proven product quality
- Added a dedicated promo code directly into the creatives
- Refocused targeting on the most active audience segments, segmented by gender, average age, and peak activity time slots during the week
Why this approach was chosen?
Users were not getting what they came for after landing on the product.
The promoted slot wasn’t visible, the bonus was outdated, and the product’s visual style didn’t match the creative – all of which created a mismatch in expectations.
Results
-
- What improved?
Reg2dep increased from 8% to 22%.
- What improved?
- How quickly did the results appear?
Almost immediately – visible within 4–5 days after relaunching the test.
Key Takeaway
- What worked best?
A full creative overhaul aligned with the actual product, which helped meet real player expectations. - Is this scalable?
Absolutely. Once a winning creative format is identified, we scale through variations – tweaking individual elements while preserving the core message and logic.
CASE 2 (PPC Traffic)
Context
- GEO: CA
- Traffic source: PPC Direct (Ice Fishing keywords)
- Brand / vertical: RollXO
- Campaign goal: Increase conversion
Initial Challenge (Pain Point)
What wasn’t working?
Most traffic came from Ice Fishing slot keywords, but the slot wasn’t available on the homepage. Users came specifically for that game, couldn’t find it immediately, and quickly lost interest.
Was this about format, messaging, visuals, or the offer?
The issue was primarily the incorrect landing page choice.
What the Data Revealed
Which metrics signaled the issue?
Lower reg2dep compared to similar traffic sources.
Where did the funnel break?
At the landing page selection stage.
What Was Tested
Visuals
Ice Fishing slot keywords.
Messaging
Pure slot-focused keywords.
Decision Made
What was changed?
Traffic was redirected straight to the demo version of the slot, and the game was also added to the homepage.
Why this approach was chosen?
Users interested in a specific game want immediate access, not extra steps inside the product.
Results
What improved?
Reg2dep increased by 8%.
How fast did the impact show?
Almost instantly – positive dynamics were visible within a couple of days.
Key Takeaway
What worked best?
Switching to a highly relevant, thematic landing page. Players landed directly on the demo and got exactly what they were looking for.
Is this scalable?
Yes – the approach can be scaled within the campaign and tested across other slots and games.
Quick Q&A
If you were launching these campaigns today, what would you do differently?
Bogdan Solodushchenko:
I’d take a more structured approach from day one: clarify with the manager what’s currently performing best, which audiences respond strongest, which top slots to use, and which bonuses convert best. And if campaigns lead to a specific slot, I’d ensure it’s immediately accessible on the product.
Key conclusions from these cases?
Bogdan Solodushchenko:
There’s no universal approach. Targeting and creatives must be customized per offer, because not every product supports the same funnel logic.
Who are these cases most useful for?
Bogdan Solodushchenko:
For all partners. New teams can boost conversion, while experienced ones can improve player quality. Personalization impacts both.
CASE 3 (SEO Traffic)
Background
After a major Google core update, conversion from the landing page on the Lucky Hunter brand dropped sharply in the DE GEO. The goal was to quickly find a working setup to retain the partner and preserve traffic volume.
Context
- GEO: DE
- SEO type: Cross-brand
- Brand / vertical: Lucky Hunter casino
- Campaign goal: Increase CR (reg2dep)
Initial Challenge (Pain Point)
What wasn’t working?
Click-to-registration was strong, but registration-to-deposit dropped significantly.
Root cause
The same landing page had been used for a long time, leading to classic creative fatigue.
What the Data Revealed
Which metrics raised red flags?
Very low r2d with strong c2r.
Where did the funnel break?
At the reg-to-deposit stage.
What Was Tested
- Slot-focused landing pages
Decision Made
Traffic was redirected directly to specific slots – not random ones.
After testing multiple options, the best performers were:
- Jetsetter
- Sweet Sugar
- Kenneth Must Die
- Bikini Paradise
Results
Which metrics improved?
R2D increased from 23% to 51%.
Time to impact
Within one month.
Key Takeaway
What worked best?
Fast reaction from the manager: identifying the issue early, flagging it to the partner, and implementing concrete corrective actions.
Is this scalable?
Yes. Creative testing remains scalable, especially as SEO shifts toward content quality rather than aggressive link-building.
CASE 4 (SEO Traffic)
Background
A partner requested a promo code-first setup, where the promo code had priority over tracking links. Traffic was planned from forums, platforms like Reddit, and Google search – both short posts with guides and long-form articles.
Context
- GEO: Worldwide
- SEO type: Parasite SEO
- Brands / vertical: Goldex Casino, Spirit Casino
- Page goal: Traffic from non-standard queries
Initial Challenge (Pain Point)
What wasn’t working?
At the approval stage, promo codes couldn’t be promoted separately without links.
Root issue
Players were not being attributed in stats after entering the promo code.
What the Data Revealed
Which metrics showed the issue?
High CTR but no registrations or deposits.
Where did the funnel break?
At registration.
What Was Tested
- Promo code flows without tracking links
Decision Made
What was changed?
Dedicated landing pages were built for these funnels, with full brand descriptions and clear promo code activation mechanics.
Why this solution?
Together with Product Managers, we analyzed the funnel, ran tests, and selected brands suitable for promo-code-driven traffic.
Results
What improved?
Traffic launched successfully, the hypothesis was validated, and the number of FDs increased.
Time to impact
Within the first two weeks after launch.
Key Takeaway
What worked best?
The promo code performed exactly as the partner expected. Providing the right functionality directly contributed to traffic growth.
Is this scalable?
Yes – we now understand how to properly use promo codes without tracking links and how to correctly track such mechanics.
Quick Q&A
If you launched these SEO campaigns today, what would you change?
Dmitry Filippov:
First, I’d evaluate how the creative performs on the partner’s specific source, not just overall stats. Second, I’d run multiple tests to explore all possible scenarios.
Main takeaway?
Dmitry Filippov:
Regularly review landing page performance and switch to alternatives immediately when performance drops.
Who benefits most from these cases?
Dmitry Filippov:
Teams working with large volumes who may miss isolated traffic drops. The manager’s role is critical – spotting issues early and bringing ready-to-use solutions. From a source and GEO perspective, this applies to any SEO type and any market.
Final Note
These cases once again prove that sustainable growth in affiliate marketing isn’t built on universal formulas, but on attention to detail: traffic source, GEO, product, and real user intent.
Most failures are fixable – the key is spotting the issue in time and doing the work to correct it.
And this is exactly where the N1 Partners affiliate team is always ready to help.
Join N1 Partners affiliate program and become number one in the industry!
News
N1 Partners puts Deputy Head Vlad Chernov in the spotlight in N1 Faces
Why do some teams scale and grow consistently, while others start losing money as soon as they increase volume — even when working with the same offers and traffic sources? The difference rarely comes down to tools. More often, it’s about how the system is managed: how decisions are made, how responsibility is distributed, and how the team works with partners when performance starts to decline.
In the new episode of N1 Faces, the N1 Partners team introduces Vlad Chernov, Deputy Head of Affiliates. In this interview, Vlad shares how he entered affiliate marketing, what managing a team really means in a fast-moving environment, where money is most often lost during scaling, and what principles help build teams that actually drive growth.
How did you get into affiliate marketing, and when did you realize this was the field you wanted to grow in?
I entered the industry in 2020. Before fully moving into affiliate marketing, I worked in a range of roles — from Customer Support Manager to Operations Director. That gave me a broad understanding of processes, team management, and how the business operates from the inside.
Over time, I became more interested in the affiliate side: how deals are structured, how traffic is driven to casino products, and which sources partners rely on. When the opportunity came to move into affiliate marketing, I quickly realized this was the area where I could develop my skills, work closely with partners, and directly see the impact of my decisions.
What brought you to N1 Partners, and what was the deciding factor?
When I was just starting out in affiliate marketing, I was actively studying the market and consistently following N1 Partners — their positioning, their brands, and the fact that they were always among the top performers. I also paid attention to the team and saw professionals I genuinely wanted to work with and learn from.
The key factors for me were a strong brand portfolio and the flexibility to choose my direction — both in terms of the team and traffic sources. It was also important for me to join a company that values new ideas and supports initiative. I’ve always seen that as a critical part of professional growth.
What’s more challenging in team management: scaling results or developing the team itself?
Scaling results is definitely more challenging.
We operate in a highly dynamic environment where the market changes almost daily. What works today may stop working tomorrow.
That’s why both we and our partners often find it harder to maintain and grow performance — it requires constant attention to key metrics and the ability to adapt quickly.
At the same time, team development is an ongoing process. We’re continuously looking for ways to streamline workflows, reduce manual tasks, and improve efficiency. We’re also gradually integrating AI into our internal processes to increase both speed and quality.
What qualities define a strong affiliate manager today?
First and foremost — strong communication skills. This is especially critical at the very first touchpoint with a partner. The way you communicate early on often determines whether you’ll even get a response.
Honesty and transparency are just as important. In this industry, building trust is essential because everyone is ultimately working toward shared results.
I would also highlight a deep understanding of analytics. An affiliate manager should go beyond basic metrics like average check or ROAS and understand profitability, traffic quality, and overall campaign efficiency.
And of course — multitasking. It’s unavoidable today. We work with 10+ brands, accept traffic from multiple sources, and constantly test new funnels and hypotheses together with partners.
How does team growth impact the quality of partner relationships, and what’s critical to avoid a drop in service when scaling?
Team growth and the level of expertise among managers form the foundation of everything that follows. We’re very selective in hiring and place a strong emphasis on analytics and understanding traffic sources, as this directly impacts our ability to scale.
As the team grows, processes become just as important as people. It’s essential to have a transparent system in place: clear standards, shared understanding of goals and key metrics, and consistent approaches to working with partners. This ensures stability and maintains service quality even as volumes increase.
At the same time, the level of the team remains critical. Strong specialists set the bar and shape the overall approach. That’s what allows you to scale without losing quality.
What are the most common pitfalls when working with partners, and where do teams usually lose money?
Most losses happen during scaling, when quality starts to drop as volume increases. A typical mistake is choosing the wrong scaling strategy — pushing all ad sets instead of focusing only on those that have already proven performance with strong CTR and EPC on the affiliate side, as well as solid player activity and ROI on the advertiser’s side.
Another key factor is offer selection. Chasing an offer with a 10–15% higher CPA doesn’t always make sense if the conversion rate is lower. In the long run, this directly impacts profitability.
From our side, we focus on selecting offers that perform best in real time for a specific traffic source. We can also provide actual performance proof and help partners secure the most competitive terms available on the market.
How do you build relationships with key partners so they don’t just stay, but grow with you?
I focus on a personalized approach and building trust-based relationships with a long-term perspective.
I’d rather start with a small test, scale gradually, and increase the rate later than run multiple tests and stop working together — even if early results are not ideal.
We work toward win-win conditions and continuously test new approaches and hypotheses. With the right strategy and offer selection, I’m confident that mutual growth is always achievable.
What helps you stay focused and make decisions under constant pressure?
Prioritization and structured task management are key.
It’s important to assess situations objectively, double-check information, and base decisions on data rather than emotions. Staying calm and focused allows me to work effectively under pressure, adapt quickly, and take responsibility for decisions with confidence.
If you weren’t in iGaming…
I’d likely still be in a related field. One option would be marketing in another industry, where I could apply my experience. Another would be returning to operations, focusing on building and optimizing processes in a high-risk environment.
Either way, I’d want to stay in a fast-paced, high-responsibility environment with challenging tasks — that’s what drives me.
Top-3 Blitz
What mistakes most often prevent affiliate teams from growing?
-
- Choosing the wrong strategy and chasing higher payouts instead of conversion and sustainability.
Teams often choose offers based on CPA alone, ignoring conversion, even though conversion drives long-term results. - Lack of communication with the manager.
Teams sometimes stop traffic without notice and draw quick conclusions without investigating deeper. The issue might not be conversion, but something like incorrect postback setup.
- Choosing the wrong strategy and chasing higher payouts instead of conversion and sustainability.
- Mixing traffic from different sources without proper segmentation.
These flows need to be agreed upon and segmented to maintain quality and properly analyze performance.
What do you look at first when evaluating a partner?
- Audience fit and traffic quality.
The traffic must match our target audience and meet internal profitability benchmarks. - Flexibility and willingness to collaborate.
The ability to adapt quickly and find win-win solutions is key. - Previous performance.
I look at historical data, results in other campaigns, and how consistently the partner meets agreements.
What factors most influence traffic profitability today?
- Cost of acquisition and player retention.
It has become harder to both acquire and retain users. - Funnel and landing page optimization.
Even high-quality traffic can drop off if the funnel is too long or complex. - Continuous campaign optimization and bid adjustments.
Daily monitoring of metrics and fast adaptation—from both the partner and advertiser side—is critical.
Working with N1 Partners
Partners who want to discuss a launch, tailor conditions to their traffic, or test an offer can reach out to Vlad directly.
N1 Partners is a multi-brand affiliate program and direct advertiser, bringing together 14+ casino and betting brands with strong LTV and Reg2Dep rates of up to 70% across Tier-1 GEOs.
N1 Partners offers competitive terms for top partners, including CPA up to €650-700 and RevShare up to 45%, ensuring stable and scalable performance.
Trusted by 14,000+ partners, N1 Partners stands out for its transparency, flexibility, and focus on long-term partnerships, supported by a strong product portfolio and advanced retention systems.
News
N1 Partners at Search iGaming Conference 2026 in Limassol
The N1 Partners team will attend the Search iGaming Conference 2026, held on April 16 in Limassol, Cyprus.
The conference will bring together more than 1,200 professionals in SEO and iGaming, including PPC experts, ASO teams, and affiliate programs representatives for networking and sharing insights.
At the event, the N1 Partners team will not only be an active participant but also a conference bags sponsor for guests. This is the part of a comfortable event experience that helps participants focus on networking and knowledge-sharing.
The conference is a perfect place to discuss profitable deals and SEO traffic, as well as learn more about the N1 SEO Traffic Cup, the first tournament in the N1 Traffic Cups global promo series from N1 Partners. The team will explain how to enter the promotion with highest efficiency at the final stage — there’s still a chance to join the tournament until April 30th.
Participate in the largest SEO tournament in the industry this spring and acquire generous prizes!
In addition to the current promo, N1 Partners affiliate managers will be happy to discuss working with any of the 14+ brands in the portfolio, top Tier-1 GEOs, as well as individual payment terms and payment models.
Why meet the N1 Partners team at the Search iGaming Conference 2026?
In Limassol, the N1 Partners team will show how partners scale traffic and increase revenue.
Key advantages include:
- 10+ GEO Tier-1
- CPA up to €700 | RevShare up to 45% for top partners
- Reg2Dep up to 70%
- Top personal offers
- Insights from analysts
Book a meeting with N1 Partners in Limassol!
Wanna get the most out of the intense Search iGaming Conference? Book a meeting with the N1 Partners team in advance.
Discover the exclusive terms of cooperation and engage with the expert team in person — guaranteed insights await!
N1 Partners team contacts:
- Oleksandr Havrylov — Affiliate Manager
- Aleksandrs Ohtins — Account Manager
- Victoria Sokolenko — Affiliate Manager
Start working with N1 Partners — become number one!
News
The Ethics of Ranking: Can Affiliates Be Both Commercial and Credible?
Ethics is one of the most important issues in the world of online gambling affiliates. Many gamblers wonder if websites can be both credible and commercial. Who better to answer this question than an industry veteran, who has worked with well known operators and affiliate companies? He is also the founder of Mithrillium Media Ltd., which makes him uniquely qualified to answer our questions.
Mister Sebastian Jarosch is a unique voice in the industry. He has worked to push gambling affiliates towards a UX-focused model, steering away from the SEO-oriented approach that seems to have been the standard for years. For his effort, Mr. Jarosch has won several awards, including:
- EGR Awards for Best Affiliate Programme 2020
- Casinomester 2020 Awards Best Casino Group
- Askgamblers Awards Best Partner 2021
Interview Questions:
How do you define ethical ranking in the iGaming affiliate space, and where do most platforms fall short?
Ethical ranking means structuring your rankings based on relevant, objective, and player-focused criteria, such as licensing, payout speed, support quality, and bonus terms, rather than on commercial deals alone. Many platforms fall short by putting profit before player trust, often placing the highest-paying brands at the top regardless of their actual value.
Can affiliate sites truly be both profit-driven and objective in how they present casino rankings?
Building a sustainable business requires a long-term mindset. Profit and objectivity often go hand in hand. Affiliates can build trust and loyalty by focusing on reliable operators that provide real value to players. Credibility leads to returning visitors, which in turn generates sustainable revenue.
What internal processes or principles do you follow to ensure your rankings remain transparent and fair?
We use a scoring system that evaluates factors like licensing, RTP fairness, withdrawal limits, player complaints, localization, and support quality. Every casino goes through a structured review checklist, and we register accounts ourselves to verify the experience. Commercial relationships never override our core review criteria.
How do you handle partnerships with operators that want higher visibility but may not fully meet your review standards?
Visibility is tied to our review scores and player satisfaction. If an operator underperforms or doesn’t meet our standards, they won’t receive top positions, regardless of the deal. We frequently receive requests from operators wanting to purchase top positions with flat fees, but all our commissions are performance-based.
Do you disclose how rankings are determined, and do you think transparency in methodology should be an industry norm?
Yes, we outline our ranking factors and provide explanations for each top listing. We absolutely believe transparency should be standard in this industry, players deserve to know why a brand is recommended and how it compares to other operators.
How do user reviews or feedback factor into your ranking algorithm, if at all?
Player feedback is a core part of our review process. We monitor complaints, payout delays, and general satisfaction. If a brand gets repeated negative feedback, their score is reviewed and the position can be downgraded.
What role do editorial independence and content-firewall structures play in maintaining integrity?
Editorial independence is critical to building credibility. All of our reviews follow the same procedures and are never influenced by commercial agreements. Operators may provide input on factual details like ownership or bonus amounts, but not on our opinions. Protecting the trust our writers build with readers requires a firm boundary between monetization and content.
Are there ethical gray areas that affiliates regularly encounter when balancing commercial pressure and content accuracy?
There’s always pressure to soften criticism or inflate ratings, especially from less reputable brands. It takes strong internal policies to navigate these challenges while staying true to user-first values. Sites like Casino-Groups operate without paid placements and rank casinos solely based on performance and trustworthiness.
Do players care whether rankings are monetized, or is trust more about perceived value and consistency?
Players know that affiliate sites generate income. What matters is consistency and value. If they consistently receive helpful, accurate insights and feel that the platform protects their interests, they’ll return, even if the rankings are monetized.
Looking ahead, what needs to happen for ethical ranking practices to become the baseline standard across the affiliate industry?
More affiliates need to understand that long-term value lies in trust, not manipulation. As players become more informed and regulators more involved, ethical ranking won’t just be a best practice, it will become a necessity. Building a strong reputation in the player community through honest reviews leads to satisfied visitors who keep coming back.
-
News2 weeks agoLEONBET Shares a New Campaign with Tanzanian Ambassador Simon Msuva
-
News2 weeks agoBehind the Game: Retention That Drives Revenue
-
News2 weeks agoN1 Partners Wins Best Affiliate Program at GamingTECH Awards 2026
-
News6 days agoThe Ethics of Ranking: Can Affiliates Be Both Commercial and Credible?
-
News1 week agoN1 SEO Traffic Cup: One Month to Unlock Rewards
-
News7 days agoWhere to Drive Tier-1 Sport Traffic in April Top Events & Promos
-
News5 days agoN1 Partners at Search iGaming Conference 2026 in Limassol
-
News18 hours agoN1 Partners puts Deputy Head Vlad Chernov in the spotlight in N1 Faces

